medium · FRM Part 1
When computing ES from a discrete probability distribution, if the cumulative probability doesn't land exactly on (1 - α), which method is commonly used to ensure the ES remains a coherent risk measure?
- Switch to a parametric normal approximation to avoid discrete probability jumps.
- Ignore the VaR threshold value and only average the outcomes that strictly exceed it.
- Always round up to the next observation to be conservative, even if it exceeds the (1 - α) probability threshold.
- Include a fractional portion of the VaR threshold loss to ensure the total probability in the calculation exactly equals (1 - α).
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More FRM Part 1 practice
- According to the CAPM, which type of risk are investors compensated for bearing?
- What specific variety of liquidity risk is being described?
- How is 'Risk Capacity' distinguished from 'Risk Appetite' in a standard risk governance fr
- If a loan has a Probability of Default (PD) of 2.0%, an Exposure at Default (EAD) of $1,00
- If two portfolios have the same Sharpe ratio but one has positive skewness and the other h
- In a 'Liquidity Spiral', what is the primary channel by which market liquidity risk and fu
- In the context of the CAPM, what is the definition of 'Alpha' (α)?
- In the risk decomposition formula σ^2_i = β^2_i σ^2_M + σ^2_ε, what does σ^2_ε represent?