medium · FRM Part 2 Liquidity & Treasury Risk
In the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), how is the funding requirement for Level 1 HQLA treated compared to its treatment in the LCR?
- LCR limits Level 1 HQLA only via its overall composition caps, whereas NSFR imposes no such cap.
- NSFR requires a 5% stable funding charge for Level 1 HQLA, whereas LCR treats it as 100% available liquidity.
- NSFR instead grants a full 100% ASF factor to Level 1 HQLA, while LCR simply applies a plain 0% haircut.
- Both ratios apply a flat 0% haircut or funding charge to Level 1 HQLA so as to encourage sovereign debt holdings.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More FRM Part 2 Liquidity & Treasury Risk practice
- What is the bank's Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), and does it meet the minimum Basel III
- To immunize the economic value of equity against a parallel rate shift, what is the requir
- A bank's Economic Value of Equity (EVE) is exposed to interest rate risk. Assets are $1,00
- How would a new $10 billion long-term mortgage (RSF factor 85%) funded by $10 billion in n
- Which lens of Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB) would show a significant loss
- A bank has 100 bn of securities classified as 'Held-to-Matur… — If interest rates rise and
- A bank's balance sheet shows total assets of 100 bn with a modified duration of DA = 5.0an
- Under the current regulatory framework, what is the specific time horizon defined for the