medium · FRM Part 2 Market Risk
If a risk system models joint defaults using a Gaussian copula calibrated during a period of low volatility, why is it likely to understate the risk of a senior CDO tranche?
- The Gaussian copula underweights idiosyncratic defaults relative to systematic ones.
- Gaussian copulas assume fat-tailed marginal distributions, overstating joint default risk.
- The Gaussian copula lacks tail dependence, failing to capture clustered defaults in crises.
- Gaussian copulas apply only to equities and cannot be calibrated to credit spreads at all.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More FRM Part 2 Market Risk practice
- Which of the following statements correctly identifies a structural deficiency of the Gaus
- If the shape parameter is ξ = 0.25, what is the tail index α?
- A leptokurtic distribution, often modeled by EVT, is characterized by which of the followi
- In the GPD framework, if the threshold u is chosen too low, what is the most likely error
- If a bank records 11 exceptions in a 250-day backtesting window for 99% VaR, what is the r
- A fund manager calculates the 'Marginal VaR' for an equity p… — What does this metric spec
- Which fixed-income mapping technique treats a bond portfolio as a single zero-coupon bond
- What happens to the mean of a GPD-distributed variable if the tail index ξ ≥ 1?