medium · Frm Part 2 Market Risk
A risk practitioner is using the Cornish-Fisher expansion to estimate the 99% VaR.
If the portfolio exhibits significant negative skewness, how will the Cornish-Fisher VaR compare to the standard Normal VaR?
- The Cornish-Fisher VaR will be higher than the Normal VaR.
- They will be identical because the Cornish-Fisher expansion only adjusts for kurtosis.
- The VaR will decrease because negative skewness implies the distribution is bounded on the left.
- The Cornish-Fisher VaR will be lower because negative skewness reduces the volatility estimate.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Frm Part 2 Market Risk practice
- A leptokurtic distribution, often modeled by EVT, is characterized by which of the followi
- If a bank records 11 exceptions in a 250-day backtesting window for 99% VaR, what is the r
- In the GPD framework, if the threshold u is chosen too low, what is the most likely error
- In the Kupiec Likelihood Ratio test, what does the null hypothesis (H_0) state?
- The Hill estimator is primarily used to provide a direct estimate of which parameter?
- What happens to the mean of a GPD-distributed variable if the tail index ξ ≥ 1?
- What happens to the VaR estimate if we move from a thin-tailed (Gumbel, ξ = 0) model to a
- What is the base capital multiplier (m) applied to a bank's internal model market risk cap