hard · Frm Part 2 Market Risk
A risk practitioner is analyzing the term structure of interest rates using the Vasicek and Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR) models.
What is the fundamental difference in how these models handle the volatility of the short rate dr_t?
- Vasicek uses a Binomial Tree to price options, while CIR requires a Monte Carlo simulation due to its non-parametric nature.
- CIR is a 'Reduced-Form' model for credit spreads, while Vasicek is a 'Structural' model for the risk-free rate.
- Vasicek assumes mean reversion to a time-varying drift θ(t), whereas CIR only allows for mean reversion to a constant long-term mean.
- In Vasicek, volatility σ is constant; in CIR, volatility is σ √(r_t), preventing interest rates from becoming negative.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Frm Part 2 Market Risk practice
- A leptokurtic distribution, often modeled by EVT, is characterized by which of the followi
- If a bank records 11 exceptions in a 250-day backtesting window for 99% VaR, what is the r
- In the GPD framework, if the threshold u is chosen too low, what is the most likely error
- In the Kupiec Likelihood Ratio test, what does the null hypothesis (H_0) state?
- The Hill estimator is primarily used to provide a direct estimate of which parameter?
- What happens to the mean of a GPD-distributed variable if the tail index ξ ≥ 1?
- What happens to the VaR estimate if we move from a thin-tailed (Gumbel, ξ = 0) model to a
- What is the base capital multiplier (m) applied to a bank's internal model market risk cap