hard · Frm Part 2 Market Risk
A desk is using a Gaussian copula to model the joint default of two high-yield issuers. During a market crisis, the realized joint defaults far exceed the model's predictions. The desk head proposes increasing the correlation parameter ρ from 0.3 to 0.7 to fix the model.
What is the structural flaw in this proposal?
- The proposal fails because the correlation between high-yield issuers is mean-reverting and will likely fall after the crisis.
- Raising the correlation parameter increases the risk of the equity tranche but does not address tail dependence.
- The Gaussian copula assumes marginals are normal, which is the primary cause of the joint default underestimation.
- Increasing correlation will decrease the probability of joint default, making the model even less conservative.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Frm Part 2 Market Risk practice
- A leptokurtic distribution, often modeled by EVT, is characterized by which of the followi
- If a bank records 11 exceptions in a 250-day backtesting window for 99% VaR, what is the r
- In the GPD framework, if the threshold u is chosen too low, what is the most likely error
- In the Kupiec Likelihood Ratio test, what does the null hypothesis (H_0) state?
- The Hill estimator is primarily used to provide a direct estimate of which parameter?
- What happens to the mean of a GPD-distributed variable if the tail index ξ ≥ 1?
- What happens to the VaR estimate if we move from a thin-tailed (Gumbel, ξ = 0) model to a
- What is the base capital multiplier (m) applied to a bank's internal model market risk cap