easy · GMAT Verbal
Argument: 'If we allow employees to work from home one day a week, they will soon demand to work from home every day, and eventually, no one will ever come into the office, leading to the total collapse of our company culture.' This argument is most clearly an example of:
- A circular argument that improperly uses its stated conclusion as one of the supporting premises.
- An ad hominem attack that dismisses remote-work advocates by impugning their personal character.
- A slippery slope fallacy that assumes a small first step will inevitably lead to an extreme outcome.
- A false dichotomy presenting only two extreme workplace options while ignoring moderate middle-ground policies.
- A hasty generalization drawing a sweeping company-wide conclusion from one single unrepresentative case.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?