medium · GMAT Verbal

Some claim that simply bringing rival groups into contact reduces prejudice. But contact under competition often deepens hostility. The reduction occurs only when the groups cooperate toward a shared goal as equals. Therefore, contact reduces prejudice only under cooperative, equal-status conditions.

In the argument, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles? (First: 'contact under competition often deepens hostility'; Second: 'contact reduces prejudice only under cooperative, equal-status conditions')

  1. The first is the argument's main conclusion; the second is the evidence the author offers in order to support it.
  2. The first is evidence that counts against a claim the argument rejects; the second is the conclusion the argument draws.
  3. Both portions are conclusions that the argument introduces only to reject them by the end of its reasoning entirely.
  4. The first states the very position the argument sets out to defend; the second is an objection raised against that position.
  5. The first is an unstated assumption that the conclusion requires; the second simply restates that assumption in different words.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More GMAT Verbal practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 77,800+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials