medium · GMAT Verbal
Passage: Cubism, pioneered by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, revolutionized the way space and time are represented in painting. By breaking objects into geometric fragments and showing them from multiple viewpoints simultaneously, Cubists rejected the tradition of single-point perspective that had dominated Western art since the Renaissance. This was not just a formal experiment; it was a way of capturing the complexity of the modern world, where the observer is constantly in motion. In a Cubist work, the subject is not a static object viewed from a distance, but a multifaceted experience that unfolds over time. Critics often found these works illegible and chaotic. Proponents, however, argued that Cubism was more 'realistic' than traditional art because it reflected the fragmented nature of perception itself. This radical approach laid the foundation for nearly all subsequent developments in abstract art.
The author's claim that Cubism was "revolutionary" is supported by which of the following details?
- Its exclusive use of circles and curves to represent the complexity of motion.
- Its ability to make abstract art more legible and easy for critics to understand.
- Its return to the artistic principles of the pre-Renaissance era.
- Its focus on static objects viewed from a great distance.
- Its rejection of the single-point perspective that had been traditional for centuries.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?