medium · GMAT Verbal
A study found that companies offering unlimited vacation time have 20% higher annual profits than companies with fixed vacation policies. Therefore, any company seeking to increase its profitability should adopt an unlimited vacation policy.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because it:
- assumes without justification that no company has ever failed after adopting such a policy.
- relies on a sample of companies that is likely to be unrepresentative of the global economy.
- fails to consider that unlimited vacation policies might be difficult for small businesses to administer.
- uses the term 'profitability' in two different senses within the same argument.
- mistakes a correlation between two factors for a causal relationship between them.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?