hard · GMAT Verbal
Analyst: Some argue statins should be prescribed to all adults over fifty. **In low-risk patients, statins prevent very few heart attacks while exposing many to side effects.** Proponents reply that the drugs are cheap. But cost is not the only burden. **Therefore blanket prescription to low-risk adults is unwarranted.**
The two boldface portions function respectively as:
- The first is the position the analyst opposes; the second is a concession the analyst makes to that position.
- The first is a consideration the analyst uses to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
- The first is the main conclusion; the second is a restatement offered for emphasis.
- The first is an objection proponents raise; the second rebuts that objection.
- Both are premises that jointly establish the proponents' recommendation.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?