medium · GMAT Verbal
A community's oral history describes a flood that geologists confirm struck the region 7,000 years ago. Yet the same oral account credits the community's current ruling clan, which formed only two centuries ago, with surviving the flood.
Which of the following best explains how the oral account can be both accurate and anachronistic?
- Geologists have separately dated several other ancient floods that struck the same region in prehistory.
- Each generation retold the flood story but recast its heroes as whichever clan held power at the time of the telling.
- The community's current ruling clan keeps detailed written genealogical records documenting each of its own two centuries of history.
- Oral histories passed down purely by word of mouth tend, as a general rule, to be less reliable than carefully kept written ones.
- The ancient flood was severe enough to permanently reshape the local river system and its banks.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?