medium · GMAT Verbal
Consider the following argument: 'Every time the local sports team wins a home game, the city's stock index rises the next day. Therefore, the team's victories are boosting the local economy.'
Which of the following best identifies the logical flaw in this argument?
- It assumes that the stock index is the only valid measure of the local economy.
- It overgeneralizes from a small and unrepresentative sample of home games.
- It concludes that the team's victories will continue indefinitely into the future.
- It treats a correlation between two events as proof of a direct causal relationship.
- It fails to establish that the team's wins are not themselves caused by a thriving economy.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?