medium · GMAT Verbal
Passage: A company found that employees who take their full lunch break away from their desks report 20% higher levels of job satisfaction than those who eat at their desks. However, the company also found that both groups of employees completed the same average number of tasks per day.
Which of the following conclusions is most supported by these findings?
- Taking a full lunch break away from the desk is not associated with an increase in daily task completion for this company.
- The company should mandate away-from-desk lunch breaks to improve employee morale without risking output.
- Employees who eat at their desks are more efficient because they spend more total minutes working each day.
- Job satisfaction has no influence on the long-term productivity of a company's workforce.
- Employees who take a full lunch break away from their desks are more productive than those who eat at their desks.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?