medium · GMAT Verbal
Passage: A company found that employees who take their full lunch break away from their desks report 20% higher levels of job satisfaction than those who eat at their desks. However, the company also found that both groups of employees completed the same average number of tasks per day.
Which of the following conclusions is most supported by these findings?
- Taking a full lunch break away from the desk is not associated with an increase in daily task completion for this company.
- The company should require all of its employees to take away-from-desk lunch breaks in order to lift morale without harming output.
- Employees who eat at their desks are more efficient workers because they devote more total minutes to working each day.
- Job satisfaction exerts no real influence on the long-term productivity of a typical company's overall workforce.
- Workers who take a full lunch break away from their desks are measurably more productive than those who eat at their desks.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?