medium · GMAT Verbal
Cities that replaced four-way stop signs with roundabouts saw a 30% reduction in average vehicle idling time. To reach its goal of reducing municipal carbon emissions, the city council should replace all major stop-sign intersections with roundabouts.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument by providing a supporting mechanism?
- Vehicle idling at intersections is a primary contributor to total carbon emissions in urban environments.
- Roundabouts are generally safer for pedestrians than intersections with stop signs.
- Roundabouts completely eliminate all vehicle idling at the intersections where they are installed.
- Reducing carbon emissions is the single most important environmental priority for municipal governments.
- Most drivers prefer roundabouts over stop signs because they reduce travel time.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?