medium · GMAT Verbal
A quantum-computing firm claims its new chip will soon beat classical supercomputers on useful problems, citing its raw qubit count, which now exceeds that of any rival. The firm concludes that surpassing classical machines is now simply a matter of adding more of these qubits.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
- Rival firms have already announced plans to build chips with even higher raw qubit counts than this firm's current chip carries, and some expect to ship within a year.
- Classical supercomputers have themselves grown markedly more powerful over the past several years, gaining speed as their processor and memory designs improved.
- The firm's qubits are so error-prone that running a useful computation would require thousands of additional qubits to correct each one, far more than the chip can hold.
- The firm's chip consumes substantially more electricity to run than a comparable classical supercomputer does, raising the operating cost of every single calculation it performs.
- Useful quantum algorithms for solving some particular classes of problems have not yet been discovered by researchers, leaving those specific tasks without a quantum method.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?