medium · GMAT Verbal
A researcher argues that a new pesticide is safe for bees because a study showed that bee colonies near treated fields had the same survival rates as colonies near untreated fields.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
- Bee populations across many different parts of the world have been steadily declining for several decades, a worrying trend with many suspected causes.
- Bees in the study routinely foraged at untreated wildflowers located several miles from the treated fields, rarely feeding on the treated crops.
- The untreated control fields in the study had themselves been sprayed during prior growing seasons with a different, older class of agricultural pesticides.
- The new pesticide breaks down completely into chemically harmless compounds within just a few short weeks of being applied to a field.
- The study was funded entirely by the large agrochemical company that both manufactures and actively markets the new pesticide being tested.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?