medium · GMAT Verbal
Winds at 500 meters are stronger and steadier than those at the 100-meter hub height of conventional turbines. A developer notes that its tethered kites fly at 500 meters, where more wind energy is available, and concludes that its kite system will therefore generate electricity more cheaply per kilowatt-hour than ground-based turbines do.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the developer's conclusion?
- Conventional ground-based turbines have been manufactured at very large scale for several decades, giving their established suppliers reliably low-cost, high-volume production lines.
- Wind speeds at the 500-meter altitude where the tethered kites fly tend to vary somewhat from one geographic region to another across the candidate sites under consideration.
- The kites require continual automated steering and frequent tether replacement, making their operating and maintenance costs per kilowatt-hour far higher than a turbine's.
- Some local communities have voiced strong objections to the visual appearance of the tall conventional turbines that have been installed near their homes and farmland.
- The tethered kites occupy noticeably less ground area at their anchor point than a conventional turbine of comparable rated generating capacity would require.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?