medium · GMAT Verbal
Full Argument: In a recent study, 500 adults were asked to drink two liters of water daily for one month, while another 500 adults were asked to continue their normal habits. At the end of the month, the water-drinking group reported higher energy levels. The researchers concluded that increased water consumption improves energy.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the researchers' conclusion?
- Many of the adults enrolled in the study reported that they already drink at least two full liters of water every single day as part of their ordinary daily routine.
- Because participants knew they were in the water group, their self-reported energy gains likely reflect expectancy or placebo effects rather than a true physiological improvement.
- The researchers running the study made no attempt whatsoever to track or to control the daily caffeine consumption of the participants in either of the two separate study groups involved.
- The study itself lasted only a single month, whereas the genuine physiological benefits of consistently improved hydration may well take considerably longer than that to fully appear.
- Several of the participants assigned to the water-drinking group reported that, throughout the study month, they needed to use the restroom far more frequently than usual.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?