medium · GMAT Verbal Reasoning
Some mergers leave today's prices unchanged yet eliminate a rival that would likely have developed a competing technology, dampening future innovation. A review process that examines only present-day price effects would clear such a merger. Yet the harm from lost innovation can exceed any short-term price benefit.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by these statements?
- A review process limited to present-day price effects can clear a merger that ultimately causes greater harm than benefit.
- Every merger that leaves today's consumer prices entirely unchanged will necessarily eliminate a likely future market innovator.
- Antitrust authorities reviewing mergers today ignore each and every possible innovation effect and weigh only present prices.
- Mergers that raise present-day prices are always more harmful to consumers than those that merely dampen innovation.
- A proposed merger ought to be cleared whenever its measured short-term consumer price benefit turns out positive.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal Reasoning practice
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily… What is the role of the…
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
All Verbal Reasoning questions · GMAT study guide · GMAT glossary · GMAT flashcards