easy · GMAT Verbal
Passage: The Miller-Urey experiment, conducted in 1952, attempted to simulate the conditions of the early Earth's atmosphere to test the feasibility of abiogenesis, the origin of life from non-living matter. By subjecting a mixture of water, methane, ammonia, and hydrogen to electrical sparks (representing lightning), the researchers were able to produce several amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. This result suggested that the complex organic molecules necessary for life could form spontaneously under prebiotic conditions. However, later geochemical evidence suggested that the early atmosphere was likely not as reducing as Miller and Urey assumed; instead of being rich in methane and ammonia, it may have been composed primarily of carbon dioxide and nitrogen. Experiments using this revised atmospheric composition have yielded fewer organic compounds, leading some scientists to look toward alternative environments, such as alkaline hydrothermal vents or comet impacts, as the potential sites for the synthesis of the first biomolecules.
Why have some scientists turned away from the Miller-Urey model of atmospheric synthesis?
- The amino acids generated in the original Miller-Urey experiment were later shown to differ from those modern living organisms actually use.
- New findings suggested that the gases used in the original experiment did not accurately reflect the Earth's early atmosphere.
- The synthesis of organic molecules was conclusively proven impossible within an atmosphere dominated entirely by carbon dioxide gas.
- Electrical sparks were ultimately ruled an insufficient energy source for forming the complex proteins that life requires.
- Subsequent experiments definitively proved that life first arose in comet impacts rather than on Earth's surface.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?