hard · Gre Verbal

Passage: Ecologists have long assumed that a more diverse plant community is a more productive one, and field surveys seem to bear this out: species-rich plots yield more biomass than species-poor ones. A confound lurks in the correlation. Diverse plots are more likely, by chance alone, to contain at least one highly productive species, and that single species may drive the extra yield—an effect of sampling, not of diversity as such. Experiments that plant fixed numbers of species while varying which ones are present let researchers separate the two. Where they have done so, diversity retains an independent effect on productivity, but a smaller one than the raw surveys suggested. The author introduces the 'confound' in order to:

1. Identify an alternative explanation that the raw correlation cannot by itself rule out
2. Prove that plant diversity exerts no genuine effect on productivity whatsoever
3. Reject the field surveys as wholly uninformative about what causes productivity
4. Argue that a single productive species is always the real cause of the extra yield
5. Show that the controlled experiments have failed to separate sampling effects from diversity

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →