hard · GRE Verbal

Researchers evaluating a coastal-lighting restriction observed that turtle hatchling survival rose after lights were limited. They concluded that darker beaches improved survival. The observation is suggestive, but predator-control efforts intensified that season; until that possibility is separated from the intervention, the causal interpretation remains provisional. Which choice best characterizes the author’s attitude toward the researchers’ conclusion?

  1. Nostalgic approval: earlier methods were inherently superior to the present intervention
  2. Qualified interest: the result may support the conclusion, but an unresolved alternative prevents confidence
  3. Unreserved enthusiasm: the result conclusively proves the intervention’s effectiveness, so no controlled follow-up could add meaningful evidence
  4. Hostile dismissal: the conclusion is fraudulent and deserves no further investigation
  5. Complete indifference: neither the evidence nor the causal question has any significance

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More GRE Verbal practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Turn wasted screen time into verifiable competence.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 75,000+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, SAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials