hard · GRE Verbal

Researchers studying soil inoculant observed that inoculated seedlings grew faster. They concluded that the inoculant accelerated growth. The result is suggestive, but those seedlings also received more sunlight; unless that possibility is addressed, the causal claim remains provisional. Which statement can be inferred from the passage?

  1. The observed change is consistent with the researchers’ explanation but does not by itself establish that explanation.
  2. The researchers’ proposed explanation has been conclusively disproved by the unresolved alternative and therefore can never explain the outcome in any population or setting.
  3. Every comparable study in other settings has independently produced precisely the same causal result.
  4. The alternative explanation identified by the author is certainly the sole cause of the observed change.
  5. The intervention is more effective than every competing policy that could address the same underlying problem.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More GRE Verbal practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Turn wasted screen time into verifiable competence.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 75,000+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, SAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials