medium · MCAT chem-phys

Consider the following: Proponents of the 'nature' side of the developmental debate argue that human personality is largely determined by genetic heritage. They point to twin studies showing high correlations in traits between identical twins reared apart. Conversely, 'nurture' advocates emphasize the plasticity of the human brain and the profound impact of early childhood environment. The synthesis of these views suggests that genes provide a range of possibilities, while environment determines where within that range an individual falls.

What is the author's primary purpose in the final sentence?

  1. The final sentence refutes the claim that the brain possesses meaningful plasticity.
  2. To provide a compromise that acknowledges the contributions of both genetics and environment.
  3. The author argues that twin studies alone are the only valid way to measure personality.
  4. The final sentence shows that the 'nature' advocates ultimately hold the stronger empirical case here.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More MCAT chem-phys practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 75,000+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials