easy · MCAT chem-phys

Consider the following: Proponents of the 'nature' side of the developmental debate argue that human personality is largely determined by genetic heritage. They point to twin studies showing high correlations in traits between identical twins reared apart. Conversely, 'nurture' advocates emphasize the plasticity of the human brain and the profound impact of early childhood environment. The synthesis of these views suggests that genes provide a range of possibilities, while environment determines where within that range an individual falls.

What is the author's primary purpose in the final sentence?

  1. To refute the idea that the human brain possesses any significant plasticity.
  2. To provide a compromise that acknowledges the contributions of both genetics and environment.
  3. To argue that twin studies are the only valid way to measure personality.
  4. To demonstrate that the 'nature' advocates have the stronger empirical case.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More MCAT chem-phys practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 46,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials