hard · MCAT chem-phys

A biochemist studies a novel inhibitor of a metabolic enzyme by running steady-state assays at two fixed substrate concentrations, [S]_1 and [S]_2 (with [S]_2 > [S]_1), across a range of inhibitor concentrations. She plots 1/v against [I] (a Dixon plot) for each substrate concentration. The two resulting lines intersect at a single point located above the x-axis, at [I] = -2 mM.

Which conclusion about the inhibitor is best supported by this Dixon plot, and what would confirm it?

  1. The inhibitor is competitive with K_i = 2 mM; a secondary replot of the line slopes against 1/[S] should be linear and pass through the origin.
  2. The inhibitor is noncompetitive with K_i = 2 mM; a secondary replot of the line slopes against 1/[S] should be linear and pass through the origin.
  3. The inhibitor is uncompetitive with K_i = 2 mM; the two lines should instead be parallel, so this data must reflect assay error.
  4. The inhibitor is mixed-type with K_i = 2 mM; the intersection point's height above the x-axis cannot be predicted from K_i alone.

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More MCAT chem-phys practice

KomFi Academy — Stop doomscrolling. Get KomFi.

Build your intelligence, anytime, anywhere.

KomFi Academy is a curated training platform with 55,000+ practice questions, 20,000+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks across the topics serious professionals study: GMAT, LSAT, MCAT, Investment Banking, Private Equity (LBOs & PE math), Private Credit, Quantitative Finance, Financial Accounting, Asset- Backed Securities, Volume Profile Analysis, Order Flow Trading, Market Microstructure, Volume Spread Analysis, Elliott Wave Theory, Volume-Price Analysis, and Public Offering Frameworks.

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials