medium · MCAT psych-soc

A sociologist compares two neighborhoods with identical median incomes. Neighborhood X has dense overlapping ties—residents know one another, share childcare, and enforce informal norms—while Neighborhood Y has many residents whose strongest connections are to people OUTSIDE the area (employers, distant kin, weak professional acquaintances).

Job-finding rates are higher in Y, but collective efficacy (residents' shared willingness to intervene for the common good) is higher in X. Which pairing of mechanisms best explains this dissociation?

  1. Y benefits from bridging social capital and weak ties for information flow, while X has bonding social capital that supports collective efficacy
  2. This reverses the assignments: informational weak ties for jobs belong to Neighborhood Y, and bonding capital for efficacy belongs to X
  3. The two neighborhoods differ in network structure, not closure alone, so one mechanism cannot explain both outcomes, meaning the dissociation is genuine
  4. This swaps the concepts entirely: job information flows through bridging weak ties, while collective efficacy rests on bonding closure, not the reverse pairing

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More MCAT psych-soc practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 77,980+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials