hard · MCAT psych-soc

A study finds that members of a low-status group who strongly identify with that group nonetheless express attitudes favoring the high-status outgroup on an implicit measure. A social psychologist explains this as evidence that the disadvantaged group has internalized the legitimacy of the status hierarchy.

This explanation is best captured by which theoretical account, and what distinguishes it from social identity theory's standard prediction?

  1. System justification theory; it predicts outgroup favoritism among the disadvantaged, whereas social identity theory predicts ingroup-favoring bias to protect self-esteem
  2. Realistic conflict theory concerns intergroup hostility from resource competition, remedied by superordinate goals, not internalized status legitimacy at all
  3. Social dominance theory does involve legitimizing myths, but predicts low-status individuals often ACCEPT, not reject, hierarchy-enhancing ideology, reversing this contrast
  4. Self-categorization theory explains depersonalization toward the shared ingroup prototype, not a shift into the outgroup, mischaracterizing the underlying cognitive mechanism

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More MCAT psych-soc practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 77,980+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials