hard · Quantitative Finance numerical
You compute the Delta of a digital (cash-or-nothing) option by bumping the spot and using a central finite difference on a Monte Carlo price, reusing the same random numbers (common random numbers) for the up- and down-bumps. As you shrink the bump size h at FIXED number of paths N, the variance of the estimated Delta is observed to BLOW UP rather than settle.
What is the precise reason?
- For the discontinuous payoff, only paths landing within h of the barrier differ between bumps, so the finite-difference increment is O(1)/h on an O(h)-probability set; its variance scales like 1/h and diverges as hto 0 at fixed N.
- Common random numbers actually break down for digital payoffs because the up- and down-bumped simulated prices become statistically independent as hto 0 on the paths near the barrier, so differencing adds rather than cancels variance.
- The central difference's own O(h^2) truncation error dominates at small h, and squaring that deterministic bias term inside the reported variance estimate is what produces the observed blow-up as h steadily shrinks toward zero at fixed N.
- Round-off error from subtracting two nearly equal simulated Monte Carlo prices dominates only once h falls below machine epsilon on double-precision hardware, and this floating-point effect alone is the sole source of the observed variance increase.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Quantitative Finance numerical practice
- To solve for the implied volatility of an option when the market price is known, which num
- Which numerical method for option pricing is generally preferred for high-dimensional cont
- Which numerical method for pricing options is best suited for high-dimensional products, s
- If the trader needs to reduce the standard error to 0.02, how many total paths are require
- If the correlation between the original payoff X and the antithetic payoff X' is ρ = -0.7
- By what factor is the variance of the antithetic estimator reduced compared to two indepen
- To reduce the standard error to $0.05 using only a larger sample size, how many total path
- What is the primary advantage of using a 'control variate' in Monte Carlo simulation for p