hard · Volume Profile Analysis profile-anatomy
A trader compares a TPO profile and a volume profile built from the exact same session. The TPO profile's POC (most time) prints at 4480, but the volume POC (most contracts) prints at 4467. The 13-point gap is unusually wide.
Holding the data identical, which session characteristic most directly produces a TPO POC meaningfully above the volume POC?
- Price spent many TPO periods slowly rotating near 4480 on thin volume, while a brief, high-velocity burst transacted enormous size near 4467 in just a few periods
- Price spent many TPO periods near 4480 and that same area also carried the heaviest contract volume, with the gap caused only by rounding to the nearest tick
- The volume POC is always below the TPO POC by construction, because volume accumulates from the session low upward while TPO accumulates from the high downward
- A wide TPO-versus-volume POC gap proves the data feeds were mismatched, since on identical data the two POCs must coincide at the same price
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Volume Profile Analysis profile-anatomy practice
- If today's Value Area High (VAH) is $1.0820 and tomorrow's Value Area Low (VAL) is establi
- A session on AUD/USD has a Value Area of $0.6650 to $0.6680. The following session's Value
- On USD/JPY, Session 1 Value Area is $151.20 to 151.80. Session 2 Value Area is $151.30 to
- Comparing two sessions on Brent Crude: Day 1 VAH is $82.50, VAL is 81.20. Day 2 VAH is $81
- Monday's Value Area is $20450 to $20550. Tuesday's Value Area is $20560 to $20660. Tuesday
- You observe a GBP/USD session where the Value Area High (VAH… — What does this 'Value Migr
- Price probes below the prior day's VAL at $1.0820 on EUR/USD. It immediately snaps back in
- What is the standard iterative step?