medium · Enhanced ACT reading
Critics of the new river dam praised it as a triumph of engineering, and in the narrow sense they were right: it stood, it held, it generated power on schedule. What the engineers' reports omitted, because their instruments were not built to detect it, was the slow disappearance of the floodplain's seasonal silt, on which three generations of farmers had unknowingly depended. The river no longer overflowed, so the fields no longer renewed themselves, and within a decade yields fell even as the turbines hummed flawlessly. The dam had not failed; it had simply succeeded at a goal too small to contain the problem it was meant to solve.
The author's central point about the dam is that:
- the engineers deliberately concealed the dam's harmful effects on floodplain farmers
- a project can perform exactly as designed and still cause harm by addressing too narrow a goal
- the dam's turbines gradually corroded from years of disuse and ultimately stopped generating power
- the farmers, given more advance notice of the change, could have shifted crops before the silt loss struck
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Enhanced ACT reading practice
- What is the main idea of the paragraph?
- Which of the following is the central point of the paragraph?
- Which choice best summarizes the main idea of the passage?
- What date was written on the map?
- what time did Elias check his watch?
- The passage indicates that the economist responds to her critics primarily by:
- The passage most strongly suggests that the keeper's true motivation for his long service
- The author includes the examples of opening jars and carrying coconut shells primarily in