hard · Enhanced ACT reading
For decades, economists treated the household as a single decision-maker, a tidy fiction that let equations balance. The model assumed one set of preferences, as though a family spoke with a single voice when allocating its income. Newer work has dismantled this convenience, showing that spouses often bargain, and that whose name an income arrives in measurably shifts how it is spent. The old model was not so much wrong as incomplete: it described an outcome while ignoring the negotiation that produced it. What looked like unity, the research suggests, was the visible surface of a quieter contest.
The author's primary purpose in the passage is to:
- argue that the older economic model of the household was based on a falsehood and should be discarded entirely
- explain why newer research revised an earlier model by exposing what that model left out
- catalog the specific spending differences that arise depending on whose name income arrives in
- defend the convenience of treating the household as a single decision-maker
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More Enhanced ACT reading practice
- What is the main idea of the paragraph?
- Which of the following is the central point of the paragraph?
- Which choice best summarizes the main idea of the passage?
- What date was written on the map ?
- what time did Elias check his watch?
- The passage indicates that the economist responds to her critics primarily by:
- The passage most strongly suggests that the keeper's true motivation for his long service
- The author includes the examples of opening jars and carrying coconut shells primarily in