medium · Enhanced ACT reading

For decades, economists treated the household as a single decision-maker, a tidy fiction that let equations balance. The model assumed one set of preferences, as though a family spoke with a single voice when allocating its income. Newer work has dismantled this convenience, showing that spouses often bargain, and that whose name an income arrives in measurably shifts how it is spent. The old model was not so much wrong as incomplete: it described an outcome while ignoring the negotiation that produced it. What looked like unity, the research suggests, was the visible surface of a quieter contest.

The author's primary purpose in the passage is to:

  1. argue that the older economic model of the household was based on a falsehood and should be discarded entirely
  2. explain why newer research revised an earlier model by exposing what that model left out
  3. catalog the specific spending differences that arise depending on whose name income arrives in
  4. defend the convenience of treating the household as a single decision-maker

Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →

More Enhanced ACT reading practice

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy

KomFi: Test Prep Made Easy — free adaptive practice for GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, National Real Estate Exam, Investment Banking, and finance with full explanations.

KomFi Academy is free GMAT prep and personalized GMAT help built as a training platform: 77,980+ practice questions, 26,500+ flashcards, on-demand video lectures, podcasts, and 4K slide decks. Flagship tracks: Free GMAT Prep, Free GMAT Resources, National Real Estate Exam Prep, Investment Banking Prep, Finance Prep, GRE, SAT, ACT, LSAT, MCAT, Financial Accounting, Private Equity, Private Credit, and Quantitative Finance.

Free GMAT Prep & Personalized GMAT Help

What's inside

Topics

View pricing · Read testimonials