medium · GMAT Verbal
Passage: The release of carbon from permafrost regions constitutes one of the most significant uncertainties in current climate modeling. As Arctic temperatures rise at twice the global average, the once-permanently frozen ground begins to thaw, exposing ancient organic matter to microbial decomposition. This process releases carbon dioxide and methane, the latter of which possesses a global warming potential significantly higher than the former over a century-long horizon. While some researchers suggest that increased boreal forest growth in warmer latitudes may sequester a portion of this released carbon, empirical data indicates that the rate of permafrost emission likely outpaces any potential vegetative uptake. The resulting positive feedback loop—where warming triggers carbon release, which in turn accelerates further warming—represents a threshold in the Earth system that, once crossed, may be difficult to reverse through anthropogenic emissions reductions alone.
Which of the following best expresses the primary purpose of the passage?
- To argue that reforestation efforts are the only viable solution to the problem of Arctic carbon release.
- To dispute the claim that Arctic temperatures are rising faster than the global average.
- To compare the warming potential of methane with that of carbon dioxide in the context of industrial emissions.
- To describe a specific feedback mechanism and its potential implications for the global climate system.
- To explain the biochemical process by which ancient organic matter is converted into microbial biomass.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?