medium · GMAT Verbal
In a common-value auction, every bidder is estimating the same unknown true value of the item, so the bidder whose estimate happens to be highest wins most often, and that winning estimate is, on average, an overestimate; economists call this the winner's curse. In a private-value auction, by contrast, each bidder assigns the item her own personal value rather than estimating a shared true value. A rare-coin dealer found that in her firm's common-value coin auctions, winning bids exceeded the coin's later-appraised value in most cases, but in her private-value estate-jewelry auctions, winning bids matched or fell below later appraisals just as often as they exceeded them.
Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage?
- No winning bid in the dealer's private-value jewelry auctions ever exceeded the eventual appraisal price at all.
- Every bidder in a common-value coin auction arrives at exactly the same estimate of the coin's true value.
- The winner's-curse overestimation did not appear in her private-value auctions as in her common-value ones.
- The dealer's estate-jewelry auctions generated substantially more total revenue than her coin auctions did overall.
- Bidders in the dealer's coin auctions were noticeably less experienced appraisers than bidders in her jewelry auctions.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?