medium · GMAT Verbal
An advocate for organic farming claims that switching to organic methods will increase global food security by preserving soil health.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
- Adopting organic farming methods completely and permanently eliminates every possible risk to soil health on farmland everywhere.
- Conventional chemical fertilizers can frequently lead to harmful nutrient runoff that contaminates the rivers, lakes, and groundwater located near treated farmland.
- A large and growing number of farmers across many regions are currently in the process of transitioning their operations from conventional methods to organic ones.
- Certified organic produce is very often sold to consumers at a noticeably higher premium price in wealthy, developed countries than its conventional equivalents.
- Organic farming typically requires significantly more land to produce the same quantity of food as conventional farming, risking lower total output.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal practice
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily wat… — What is the role of the st
- What is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which of the following, if true, most undermines the agency's claim?