medium · GMAT Verbal Reasoning
Theoretical models in social science often suggest that as urban density increases, interpersonal trust decreases due to the 'bystander effect'. However, recent studies in high-density European hubs indicate that frequent incidental interactions actually foster higher localized trust. These studies suggest that the regularity of contact outweighs the anonymity of the crowd.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the passage?
- European hubs have lower density than theoretical social science models assume.
- High urban density does not invariably lead to a decline in interpersonal trust.
- Social science models are generally inaccurate when applied to European cities.
- Frequent interaction is the only factor that can raise interpersonal trust in cities.
- The bystander effect is the primary cause of urban anonymity.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GMAT Verbal Reasoning practice
- A gardener says: 'All roses in this garden require daily… What is the role of the…
- What is the conclusion?
- What logical role does the first sentence play in the researcher's argument?
- What logical role do the first two statements play?
- Which of the following is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
- Which statement is the conclusion?
- What is the conclusion?
All Verbal Reasoning questions · GMAT study guide · GMAT glossary · GMAT flashcards