medium · GRE Verbal
Conservationists have often assumed that the least disturbed habitats harbor the greatest biodiversity, and that human presence is therefore uniformly a subtraction from nature's richness. Studies of certain long-inhabited landscapes trouble this assumption. In some Amazonian forests, the concentration of useful tree species is highest precisely where pre-Columbian peoples once lived and cultivated, suggesting that centuries of human management enriched rather than depleted the local flora. The point is not that all human activity benefits ecosystems — much of it plainly does not — but that the equation of pristineness with abundance rests on a picture of humans as necessarily external to the systems they inhabit.
The author includes the clause 'much of it plainly does not' primarily in order to
- Concede outright that the cited studies may in fact be methodologically flawed
- Forestall an overgeneralization the evidence might otherwise invite
- Introduce the passage's central main claim for the very first time
- Directly contradict the study's finding about the Amazonian forests
- Argue that human management of land always enriches local biodiversity
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More GRE Verbal practice
- Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the paradox?
- The novelist was known for his ________ descriptions of nature, which often spanned severa
- The sudden ________ in the expansion of the metropolitan district was attributed to the en
- Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the paradox?
- Naturalist: The blue-throated warbler and the gray-crowned warbler occupy the same forest
- Had the investigator been more ________, she might have discovered the discrepancy in the
- A software firm requires that every new feature pass an automated test suite before it is
- Naturalist: On this island, the native songbird population has declined sharply over the p