easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Several Logical Reasoning question types ask test-takers to supply something to an argument. One such type asks for the answer choice that, when added to the premises, enables the conclusion to be properly drawn.
The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Sufficient Assumption, which furnishes the missing link that makes the conclusion follow with certainty
- Inference, which asks what already follows from the stated premises
- Strengthen, which makes the conclusion more probable without guaranteeing it
- Required Assumption, which must hold for the argument to work but need not by itself secure the conclusion
- Sufficient Assumption, but only when the argument also happens to contain a conditional premise
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?