medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Suppose that A to B and that B to C.
Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The occurrence of A is enough to guarantee the occurrence of C.
- The occurrence of B is enough to guarantee the occurrence of A.
- Whenever C occurs, A must occur as well.
- Whenever A is absent, C must be absent as well.
- A and C cannot both occur in the same situation.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?
- If the statement above is true, which one of the following must also be true?