medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Suppose that A to B and that B to C.
Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The occurrence of A is enough to guarantee the occurrence of C.
- The occurrence of B is itself enough to guarantee occurrence of A.
- Whenever C does in fact occur, it follows that A occurs as well.
- Whenever A is wholly absent, it follows that C is also absent too.
- A and C simply cannot both occur together in one same situation.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?