medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The team wins if and only if it scores more than 10 points.
Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establishes?
- Each of the two events both guarantees and is guaranteed by the other, so neither can occur without the other.
- Winning establishes a score above 10, but a score above 10 does not, by itself, establish a win for the team.
- Without knowing some additional facts about the game, it cannot be determined which event is the requirement.
- Topping 10 points assures a win, yet a win for the team can still occur even on a final score below that.
- Topping 10 points and winning are independent events whose simultaneous co-occurrence would be coincidence.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?