easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
The firm should retain remote meetings. They reduced travel cost last year, and client satisfaction remained stable.
Which choice states the main conclusion?
- Costs are the only consideration in public policy.
- The proposal has no possible drawback.
- Every organization should adopt the same policy.
- The firm should retain remote meetings.
- Remote meetings reduced travel cost last year.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ