hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
At the Vellner Prize for unpublished fiction, a submission advances to the finalist round only if it has passed technical review. Nothing that fails to include a signed originality affidavit has ever passed technical review. Moreover, no submission that arrived after the extended deadline has ever included a signed originality affidavit. This year, fewer than two-fifths of the submissions in the finalist round were entirely original works never previously submitted to any prior competition.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by these statements?
- Every submission that passed technical review this year automatically advanced to the finalist round.
- No submission that arrived after the extended deadline has ever advanced to this year's finalist round.
- Since fewer than two-fifths of finalist submissions were entirely original, most arrived after the deadline.
- At least one submission that arrived after the extended deadline still passed technical review this year.
- The prize committee will disqualify any future submission lacking an affidavit, however early it arrives.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
- No one who is tired can concentrate. Peter is not tired. The… — Which of the following cor