medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A financial analyst observes that every time the interest rate rises, the stock market declines. Today the stock market did not decline.
Based solely on the analyst's observation, what must be true?
- The interest rate held fully steady.
- The interest rate did not rise today.
- The stock market will fall tomorrow.
- Nothing can be inferred from this.
- Some other cause kept the market up.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ