easy · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Educator A: School days should start at 10 AM. Research shows that teenagers' brains function better later in the morning, which would improve their academic performance. Educator B: Starting school later would create a nightmare for working parents who need to drop their children off before 9 AM. The logistical costs would far outweigh any minor academic gains.
Educator A and Educator B disagree over whether:
- the school day ought to be shifted to begin at 10 AM
- working parents encounter real difficulties arranging childcare
- adolescents' cognitive abilities are sharper later in the morning
- academic achievement is the sole purpose a school exists to serve
- the logistical burdens of a later start would outweigh its academic benefits
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?