medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Harlow: Every startup that has succeeded did so because its founder brought prior experience in the relevant industry. Such experience is indispensable to success. Bianca: That cannot be right. Several of the most successful startups on record were launched by founders who had no prior experience in the industry they entered.
Harlow and Bianca disagree about whether
- Founders without industry experience tend to be more innovative
- Prior industry experience can contribute to a startup's success
- Prior industry experience is necessary for a startup to succeed
- whether prior industry experience can sometimes make a startup founder less adaptable
- Some startups with experienced founders have nonetheless failed
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?