medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
Pace: No translation can ever capture the music of the original poem. Moving verse from one language into another always sacrifices something essential in its sound. Quinn: On the contrary, some translations improve on the original's music. A sufficiently gifted translator can find effects in the receiving language that surpass anything.
If Pace and Quinn's statements are both accurately reported, which one of the following must be true?
- Quinn believes every translation improves on its original.
- They use different standards for judging the musical quality of every original poem, including rhythm, meter, and the use of repeated sound patterns.
- Pace denies that sound contributes to a poem's identity.
- At least one of them is mistaken about whether any translation can equal or surpass its original's music.
- Both agree that a gifted translator always preserves every sound effect.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?