hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A committee bylaw states that neither the treasurer nor the secretary may chair a subcommittee. Each subcommittee must have exactly two co-chairs, drawn from a pool consisting of the treasurer, the secretary, the vice-president, the historian, and the parliamentarian.
If the bylaw is followed, which one of the following must be true?
- Two of the vice-president, the historian, and the parliamentarian serve as co-chairs.
- The historian, rather than the vice-president or the parliamentarian, is a co-chair.
- Exactly one of the historian and the parliamentarian, but not both, co-chairs the subcommittee.
- The treasurer, being barred from chairing, instead serves as the subcommittee's recording clerk.
- All three of the vice-president, the historian, and the parliamentarian co-chair together.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?