medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
A nutritionist recommends: 'To lose weight effectively, one should avoid sugary drinks and exercise for at least 30 minutes a day.'
If the nutritionist's recommendation is valid, which of the following is most strongly supported?
- Someone who fails to lose weight effectively may have continued consuming sugary drinks.
- Anyone who skips sugary drinks and exercises 30 minutes daily is guaranteed to lose weight effectively.
- Sugary drinks are the single largest contributor to weight gain in the general population.
- Exercising 60 minutes a day yields exactly double the weight-loss benefit of exercising 30 minutes.
- Avoiding sugary drinks matters more for weight loss than the daily exercise the nutritionist mentions.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these premises?
- Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the authors' conclusion?
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ