medium · LSAT Logical Reasoning
No philosopher is a professional skydiver. Some professional skydivers are philosophers.
If these statements are both asserted, which one of the following must be true?
- The two statements cannot both be true, since they assert opposite things about the same overlap.
- Some philosophers, though not necessarily most, are not professional skydivers in any season.
- Most philosophers, being cautious by temperament, steer clear of physically dangerous pursuits.
- Philosophy and professional skydiving are, by their very nature, fundamentally incompatible fields.
- At least one professional skydiver has, at some point, formally studied academic philosophy.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?