hard · LSAT Logical Reasoning
At Brightwater Consulting, any analyst assigned to the Mercer account must be fluent in Spanish. Moreover, no analyst who works remotely is assigned to the Mercer account. Priya is a Brightwater analyst who is not fluent in Spanish.
If these statements are true, which one of the following must also be true?
- Priya is not assigned to the Mercer account.
- Priya works remotely.
- No Brightwater analyst who lacks fluency in Spanish is assigned to any account.
- If Priya were to become fluent in Spanish, she would be assigned to the Mercer account.
- Brightwater would benefit if Priya became fluent in Spanish.
Sign up free to see the explanation and track your rank →
More LSAT Logical Reasoning practice
- Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
- Which one of the following can be properly inferred from these statements?
- The question type just described is best identified as which one of the following?
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument
- The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
- Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship the statement establ
- Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the two conditionals above?
- Which one of the following must be true given the statement above?